The Country Shrink on November 15th, 2009

Darwinists of all stripes can hardly refrain from evolutionary storytelling when it comes to human psychology.  Not surprisingly, they focus largely on their opponents–those who have faith in God.  The recent work by archeologists Joyce Marcus and Kent Flannery seems to follow the familiar template.1  Start with an actual study, then speculate wildly about how [...]

Continue reading about The God Gene Redux

The Country Shrink on May 20th, 2009

The latest in the saga of nature worship is the discovery of a ‘47 million year old’ fossil given the name Ida.  Hailed in the popular press as the long-sought-after ‘missing link,’ Darwinius masillae is being held up in some circles as the “Eighth Wonder of the World.”
Perhaps my impression that this is being held [...]

Continue reading about Religious Artifact or Scientific Discovery?

The Country Shrink on April 1st, 2009

We do know that 3 months ago,(1) we did tell you that super volcanoes did cause the mass extinction at the P/T boundary of 250 million years ago (praise Science).  We did tell you before that it was from the impacts of asteroids, but we will now tell you that we do have a new [...]

Continue reading about A Naturalistic Fairy Tale-Part XXVII

The Country Shrink on March 18th, 2009

Paleontologists recently discovered a fossil of an octopus and attributed an age of 95 million years (late Cretaceous) to the specimen.(1) They noted that:
“These things are 95 million years old, yet one of the fossils is almost indistinguishable from living species.” [EurekAlert] The fossils provide an extraordinary glimpse into the evolutionary history of [...]

Continue reading about Evolution: A Theory of Change? The Case of the Octopus.

The Country Shrink on March 14th, 2009

You never thought you would hear me say something like this, but I’m saying it now. Richard Dawkins deserves some credit for his most recent book, A Devil’s Chaplain. Now, I haven’t even read the book, and probably won’t unless I can find a used copy somewhere. But, I just wanted to [...]

Continue reading about Some Applause for Richard Dawkins

The Country Shrink on March 12th, 2009

Recently, a group of students from Liberty University visited the Smithsonian Institute. David DeWitt who is the
professor who teaches the Advanced Creation studies class takes his students there every year. The Washington Post had a writeup on the trip, and for the first time in my memory, it was a facts-based article.1 The [...]

Continue reading about Grandma Morgie

The Country Shrink on March 1st, 2009

Dickie D, and another fellow discuss evolution in this video.  They start off talking about the eye, and state that it is not designed because it is poorly designed.  In other words, they claim this falsifies ID.  Which is interesting given that Darwinists state that ID is not science and not falsifiable.  Then also interestingly, [...]

Continue reading about ID is False; ID is not Falsifiable: Which is it?

The Country Shrink on February 14th, 2009

Over at Atheism is Dead, there are two very well written recent posts on the creation myths of atheists by means of cosmology. They are fairly long posts, but worth the time to read.
In the Beginning… Cosmology, Part I – The Pre Big Bang Scenario
In the Beginning… Cosmology, Part II – Book, Chapter and [...]

Continue reading about The Naturalistic Myth of Creation

The Country Shrink on December 31st, 2008

And then did we decide that giant meteors were possibly not the cause of mass extinction. We did decide that perhaps magnetic blips resulting in SUPER volcanoes (1) were the cause (praise Science). Please do disregard our past theories, or keep them in mind, in case we bring them up again as THE [...]

Continue reading about A Naturalistic Fairy Tale-Part XXII

The Country Shrink on December 6th, 2008

Indeed. It’s a conundrum for an anti-design perspective. From an ID and theological perspective, it’s not surprising that even the quantity of this material points to design. The notion from the anti-design perspective is that “common sense doesn’t work.” Fine. Sometimes it doesn’t. But, I don’t think people even have to rely on “common sense” to support a design perspective. You can rely on logic, philosophy, and scientific reasoning to support a design perspective. It just happens that these perspectives can also correspond with “common sense.” The same cannot be said for an anti-design perspective.

Continue reading about Even the Unmeasurable Points to Design