And then did we, Most High Scientist, put to bed the mystery of the origin of sex. Sex did arise from hermaphrodites (praise Science), as we do now know from our study of strawberry plants.(1) Well at least in plants, but we’ll title the article as if the whole mystery we did solve, because [...]
There’s no doubt about it, the average American diet is atrocious. Give us the 44 ounce softdrinks, Big Macs, ice cream, and snack cakes, and we’ll take that every time over a healthy diet of fruit and vegetables. Obesity is referred to as an “epidemic” in America. I agree with all of that.[1] Here’s where [...]
Continue reading about Darwinian Psychology-Part II: Why we eat junk
I am going to write an ongoing series on Darwinian Psychology (aka Evolutionary Psychology). Unfortunately, my chosen field (psychology) has probably generated more “just so”(1,2) stories than has biology. Paleontologist and Darwinist, Stephen J. Gould, wrote about “Darwinian Fundamentalism”,(3) and specifically singled out Darwinian Psychology for criticism. He also noted the similarity [...]
Continue reading about Darwinian Psychology-Part I: An Introduction
Then did we discover that some of those early trails that we did think were from multi-cellular creatures1 (or evotures to coin a phrase unconnected with the root term Creation), were actually from a gigantic single-celled organism.
This giant single celled creature’s trails were from 10 million years before the Cambrian explosion did occur.2 Within 5,000 [...]
I finally got to see the documentary (I signed up for Netflix on my Xbox 360–cool). I think it was very well done, and it points out the true state of science and academia. While it made use of strong visual rhetorical devices, I found them compelling and not inappropriate.
I would also say [...]
I couldn’t help posting it here. Maybe even some of the pro-evo folks will get a laugh.
I think I’ve said before I love Sci-Fi. There’s nothing better than a worm-hole to an alternate universe. Modern day cosmologists seem to be so distressed by the notion that our universe seems to be so “fine-tuned” to allow for the existence of life that they engage in arguments from imagination (not those “illogical” arguments [...]
Here is an interesting single observation challenge for the uniformitarians:
I wonder how long it took this rock to form, and what’s inside…
http://creationontheweb.com/content/view/6128/
UPDATE: I’ve turned off comments on this post, and deleted all the comments including my own.
And then did we discover that minerals did co-evolve with life.1 Not that minerals did mutate, but that biological processes did transform the interstellar grains into the thousands of minerals that we find on the Earth today. All of the elements did exist in that early primordial dust, but praise Science that life [...]
Many materialists (atheists and theistic evolutionists most often) argue that materialistic philosophy is key to scientific advancement. If any ideas of Creationists are allowed to even be referenced, then scientific progress will halt and people will die. There will be mass and widespread calamitous events, and we will return to the Dark Ages.
Mphuthumi [...]
Continue reading about Does referencing the Creator inhibit science?
Recent Comments